From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cerce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 1, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record of the plea proceedings indicates that in return for the bargained-for plea, the defendant voluntarily and expressly waived his right to raise on appeal any question with respect to the admissibility of his confession and certain physical evidence. Accordingly, the defendant's arguments on these issues must be rejected (see, People v Williams, 36 N.Y.2d 829, cert denied 423 U.S. 873).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, without merit (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v Lowrance, 41 N.Y.2d 303; People v Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304; People v Martinez, 127 A.D.2d 855; People v Barton, 103 A.D.2d 750; Strickland v Washington, 466 U.S. 668, reh denied 467 U.S. 1267; People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cerce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Cerce

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NICHOLAS CERCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Dimauro

The record demonstrates that, in response to inquiries from the court and the prosecutor, the defendant…