People v. Cepeda

1 Citing case

  1. People v. Correa

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4662 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 71 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In People v Correa (supra, 15 NY3d at 224), the Court of Appeals noted the existence of this open question but did not decide it.

    The Appellate Division erroneously decided that the Chief Judge and Chief Administrative Judge were without authority to order the transfer of defendant's case from Criminal Court to Supreme Court. ( People v Cepeda, 71 AD3d 422; People v Jones, 18 Misc 3d 63, 10 NY3d 767; People v Darling, 50 AD2d 1038; Kagen v Kagen, 21 NY2d 532; Thrasher v United States Liab. Ins. Co., 19 NY2d 159; People v Turza, 193 Misc 2d 432; Matter of Malloy, 278 NY 429; Motor Veh. Mfrs. Assn. of U.S. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175; People v Luciano, 10 NY3d 499; People v Wrotten, 14 NY3d 33.) Legal Aid Society, Criminal Appeals Bureau, New York City ( Martin M. Lucente and Steven Banks of counsel), for appellant in the second above-entitled action.