From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cedano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1990
159 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 12, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Brien, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

We have also considered the contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cedano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1990
159 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Cedano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HIDEKI CEDANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)