From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cecil English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1991
177 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Defense counsel's application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cecil English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1991
177 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Cecil English

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CECIL ENGLISH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 306