Opinion
2d Juv. B329426
11-13-2023
In re C.C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. v. C.C., Defendant and Appellant. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
Dee A. Hayashi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Superior Court County of Los Angeles (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. IV, § 21.), No. FJ57885, Benjamin R. Campos, Temporary Judge
Dee A. Hayashi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
BALTODANO, J.
C.C. appeals from the juvenile court's order denying his suppression motion. (Welf. &Inst. Code, § 700.1.) The section 602 petition, as amended, alleged appellant carried a loaded firearm not registered to him on his person in a public place. (Pen. Code, § 25850, subd. (c)(6).) After his motion to suppress evidence was denied (§ 700.1), he pleaded no contest. The juvenile court granted deferred entry of judgment. (§ 790 et seq.)
Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues, noting that the order was not appealable. On September 11, 2023, we advised appellant by mail that he had 30 days to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.
Denial of a motion to suppress pursuant to section 700.1 followed by deferred entry of judgment pursuant to section 790 et seq. is not an appealable judgment or order. (In re Mario C. (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1308-1309.) Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's counsel has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109-110; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.
We concur: GILBERT, P. J. CODY, J.