Opinion
11-20-2014
The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. Karen M. CAZA, Appellant.
Martin J. McGuinness, Queensbury, for appellant. Respondent, precluded.
Martin J. McGuinness, Queensbury, for appellant.
Respondent, precluded.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM:The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant's argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently, is unpreserved for our review (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 491–493, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946 [2008] ).
Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, in a memorandum.