From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cave

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Ward, J. — Attempted Burglary, 1st Degree.

PRESENT: WISNER, J. P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

There is no merit to defendant's contentions that County Court failed to advise defendant of his rights or elicit a proper waiver of those rights before accepting defendant's plea of guilty ( see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16-19; People v. Davenport, 273 A.D.2d 926); that the plea allocution was factually insufficient ( see, People v Hall, 71 N.Y.2d 1002, 1006; People v. Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950, 951; People v. Amaya, 219 A.D.2d 523, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 844); or that the plea was invalid, and the right to effective assistance of counsel violated, as a result of defense counsel's error in informing defendant of a potential sentence ( see, People v. Garcia, 92 N.Y.2d 869, 870-871; People v. Modica, 64 N.Y.2d 828, 829). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status and imposing the minimum possible sentence of incarceration, a determinate term of 3 1/2 years.


Summaries of

People v. Cave

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Cave

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL J. CAVE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

"The phrase ‘meaningful representation’ does not mean ‘perfect representation’ " ( Ford , 86 N.Y.2d at 404,…

People v. Davis

"The phrase 'meaningful representation' does not mean 'perfect representation'" (Ford, 86 N.Y.2d at 404,…