From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cavataio

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 26, 1971
190 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 10279.

Decided May 26, 1971. Leave to appeal denied 386 Mich. 779.

Appeal from Oakland, James S. Thorburn, J. Submitted Division 2 May 10, 1971. (Docket No. 10279.) Decided May 26, 1971. Leave to appeal denied, 386 Mich. 779.

Peter Cavataio was convicted of assault and battery and malicious destruction of personal property. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Thomas G. Plunkett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Dennis Donohue, Chief Appellate Counsel, for the people.

Franklin Harris, for defendant.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and FITZGERALD and QUINN, JJ.


Convicted by jury verdict and sentenced, defendant raises two issues on his appeal. The first relates to his attempt to disqualify the trial judge, and the second concerns prejudicial remarks of the prosecuting attorney in closing argument.

Grounds for disqualification of a judge and the procedure to obtain disqualification are specified in GCR 1963, 405. Defendant moved orally for the trial judge's disqualification on the basis of the latter's personal bias and prejudice against defendant, 405.1(3). The record does not establish nor does defendant demonstrate the personal bias and prejudice in fact required for disqualification. Crowley, Milner Co. v. Macomb Circuit Judge (1927), 239 Mich. 605, 613.

On denial of the oral motion for disqualification, defendant moved for permission to file a motion for disqualification supported by affidavits, 405.2. Denial of this request was not error. Defendant elected to proceed under 405.1. The election satisfied his right to move for disqualification, and the record does not demonstrate an abuse of discretion in the denial of the subsequent motion.

Objection to the prosecuting attorney's prejudicial remarks in closing argument was sustained and the jury was instructed to disregard those remarks. If error occurred, it was not reversible error, People v. Gerndt (1928), 244 Mich. 622.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cavataio

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 26, 1971
190 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Cavataio

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. CAVATAIO

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: May 26, 1971

Citations

190 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
190 N.W.2d 718

Citing Cases

United States v. Cavataio

This is also an issue that was presented to the state appellate courts, which considered and decided…

People v. Teague

We find no error as there is no showing of the prejudice or personal bias required for reversal on this…