From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Causer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1974
43 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

January 17, 1974

Appeal from the Steuben County Court.

Present — Marsh, J.P., Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment of conviction we deem it necessary to repeat the often reiterated admonition that a prosecutor in summation must not make himself an unsworn witness to support his case by his veracity and official position ( Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88; People v. Lovello, 1 N.Y.2d 436, 439; People v. Castelo, 24 A.D.2d 827). The reason why such conduct is uniformly condemned is because a public prosecutor is a quasi-judicial officer representing the State and presumed to act not to obtain a conviction but impartially in the interest only of justice ( People v. Fielding, 158 N.Y. 542, 547). While the prosecutor's conduct in this case was uncalled for and improper, as he himself recognized and as evidenced by his apology, we agree with the trial court that the evidence at a post-trial hearing did not establish sufficient prejudicial effect upon the jury to warrant vacating the judgment.


Summaries of

People v. Causer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1974
43 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Causer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HOMER J. CAUSER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

People v. Nuzzi

Furthermore, it has often been written that a prosecutor is a quasi-judicial officer. ( Matter of Schumer v…

People v. Kyser

The remarks were exceedingly inflammatory and denied defendant a fair trial and require reversal. The…