From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Castrechino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 7, 1984
105 A.D.2d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 7, 1984

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Celli, J., Kennedy, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O'Donnell, JJ.


Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for a suppression hearing. Memorandum: Defendant was charged with two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree when the automobile in which he was a passenger was stopped and searched by police who found a loaded .38 caliber handgun in the trunk. His pretrial motion to suppress was denied by the suppression court, without a hearing, on the ground that he lacked standing. After a jury trial, defendant was convicted as charged. Although the "automatic standing" rule has been abrogated ( United States v Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83; People v Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160), a person charged with a possessory crime is entitled to the constitutional guarantees against unreasonable searches and seizures when he can demonstrate a reasonable expectation of privacy in the invaded place ( United States v Salvucci, supra, p. 93; People v Ponder, supra, p. 166). The record indicates that the lawful owner of the automobile had entrusted it to defendant's possession several days previously for needed repairs. As a garageman or repairman, defendant had lawful possession of the car (cf. People v Weeden, 89 A.D.2d 814) so as to give him a reasonable expectation of privacy (see People v Robinson, 121 Misc.2d 267, 269-270). Accordingly, defendant has standing to contest the search and seizure and denial of the motion to suppress without a hearing was error.


Summaries of

People v. Castrechino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 7, 1984
105 A.D.2d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Castrechino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD CASTRECHINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Wilt

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant, tried…

People v. Wesley

erty was ultimately proved through evidence of dominion and control, but where the defendant was found not to…