From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 2000
275 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

September 28, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered May 21, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, criminal contempt in the second degree, and aggravated harassment in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 years, 1 year and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Ellen Sue Handman, for respondent.

David Crow, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Andrias, Buckley, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in receiving uncharged crimes evidence concerning defendant's pattern of abuse of the complainant. This background evidence provided a complete picture of the events in question and was necessary to explain that certain conduct by the complainant was the product of fear (see,People v. Steinberg, 170 A.D.2d 50, 73, affd 79 N.Y.2d 763). The probative value of this evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect, which was minimized by the court's thorough limiting instructions. Defendant was not prejudiced by the fact that the court neglected to make an advance Ventimiglia ruling, as the People had requested at the outset of the trial.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 2000
275 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY CASTILLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 526

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Andrias, Ellerin, Rubin, Buckley, JJ. The court properly exercised its discretion in…