From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 8, 1990
167 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 8, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


The People sufficiently established the value of the vehicle to support the attempted larceny convictions. The People's witness, a licensed appraiser, testified the actual value of the car was approximately $4,650, less the minor costs associated with refinishing scratches on the car's body and replacing the windshield. Photographs of the car's interior and exterior were offered into evidence and presented to the jury. Moreover, testimony from both the People's appraiser and the Honda's owner indicated that the car was in "good" condition. The fact that defendant's expert appraiser arrived at an actual value figure of $2,990 raised a credibility issue for the jury to resolve. Notably, the defense appraiser's expertise was discredited by his admission, on cross-examination, that he, inter alia, did not test-drive the automobile in question.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 8, 1990
167 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCISCO CASTILLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 240

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we…