From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cassell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1984
101 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

May 25, 1984

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Forma, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction for criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and third degree, defendant raises several arguments, only one deserving of our attention. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial because the prosecutor unlawfully used four of eight peremptory challenges to exclude the only black persons remaining in the panel of 38 prospective jurors. We decline to reach this contention because the voir dire was not recorded and there is no basis in the record to ascertain whether defendant established a prima facie case of discrimination (see People v Charles, 61 N.Y.2d 321; People v McCray, 57 N.Y.2d 542, 546, cert den ___ US ___, 103 S Ct 2438, mot for rearg den 60 N.Y.2d 587). We have considered the other points raised by the defendant and find each of them lacking in merit.


Summaries of

People v. Cassell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1984
101 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Cassell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES H. CASSELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 25, 1984

Citations

101 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Senkowski

The Court bases its conclusion on the fact that the sole ground argued by the state was Walker's procedural…

People v. Wilson

The voir dire was not recorded, a hearing was not conducted on the claim of racial discrimination, and the…