Opinion
2020–08193 Ind. No. 363/17
11-02-2022
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony CASIANO, appellant.
Kelley M. Enderley, Poughkeepsie, NY, for appellant. Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (William C. Milaccio and Daniel H. Davis of counsel), for respondent.
Kelley M. Enderley, Poughkeepsie, NY, for appellant.
Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (William C. Milaccio and Daniel H. Davis of counsel), for respondent.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered July 11, 2019, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea rests within the sound discretion of the court, and generally the court's determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of its discretion (see CPL 220.60[3] ; People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802 ; People v. Richards, 186 A.D.3d 1411, 1412, 128 N.Y.S.3d 871 ). Contrary to the defendant's arguments on appeal, since the court permitted both sides to submit papers in support of and in opposition to the motion, the defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions (see People v. Manor, 27 N.Y.3d 1012, 1013, 35 N.Y.S.3d 272, 54 N.E.3d 1143 ; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927, 365 N.Y.S.2d 161, 324 N.E.2d 544 ).
It is well-settled that "when a motion to withdraw a plea is patently insufficient on its face, a court may simply deny the motion without making any inquiry" ( People v. Mitchell, 21 N.Y.3d 964, 967, 970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405 ). Contrary to the defendant's contentions, he was not entitled to withdraw his plea, nor was the County Court required to conduct a hearing on the motion, since he proffered only unsubstantiated and conclusory assertions of innocence and confusion as to the nature of the plea, which were contradicted by the record (see People v. Hollmond, 191 A.D.3d 120, 136–137, 135 N.Y.S.3d 449 ; People v. Griffith, 78 A.D.3d 1194, 1195, 913 N.Y.S.2d 264 ).
In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v. Richards, 186 A.D.3d at 1412, 128 N.Y.S.3d 871 ).
DUFFY, J.P., RIVERA, DOWLING and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.