Opinion
2015–09672
01-30-2019
Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Richard Joselson and Jose David Rodriguez–Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant. Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Richard Joselson and Jose David Rodriguez–Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant.
Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Correction Law § 168–l(8) provides that a failure by a state or local agency to act or by a court to render a determination within the time period specified by the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6–C; hereinafter SORA) shall not affect the obligation of a sex offender to register or verify under SORA, nor shall such failure prevent a court from making a determination regarding the sex offender's risk level. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the delay in holding a hearing to determine his risk level pursuant to SORA was not so "outrageously arbitrary" as to constitute "a gross abuse of governmental authority" ( People v. Sprinkler, 162 A.D.3d 802, 802, 79 N.Y.S.3d 232 ; People v. Gonzalez, 138 A.D.3d 814, 815, 29 N.Y.S.3d 542 ; see People v. Gallagher, 129 A.D.3d 1252, 1253, 11 N.Y.S.3d 712 ; People v. Meyers, 16 Misc.3d 115, 117–118, 842 N.Y.S.2d 682 [App. Term, 2d Dept.] ; cf. People v. Gregory, 71 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 897 N.Y.S.2d 665 ).
AUSTIN, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.