From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Casasnovas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 25, 1985
108 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 25, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Broomer, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The court's participation in the questioning of the witnesses was not objected to, and therefore the issue has not been preserved. In any event, such questioning was well within proper bounds and did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial ( People v Limage, 57 A.D.2d 906, affd 45 N.Y.2d 845 on mem at App. Div.; People v Cruz, 100 A.D.2d 518). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Casasnovas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 25, 1985
108 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Casasnovas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SANTIAGO CASASNOVAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Montalvo v. Annetts

Thus, defendant's present claims of judicial bias and prejudice are . . . unpreserved for review . . ."),…