From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cartwright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 2, 2003
301 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

13787

Decided and Entered: January 2, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered January 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Bonnie Burgio, Watertown, for appellant.

Gerald A. Keene, District Attorney, Owego, for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and, Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 5 to 10 years after pleading guilty to the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. He contends on this appeal that the sentence was harsh and excessive and requests that it be reduced in the interest of justice. We disagree. A sentence that falls with the permissible statutory guidelines will not be disturbed unless the sentencing court abused its discretion or there are extraordinary circumstances that would warrant modification in the interest of justice (see People v. Carter, 267 A.D.2d 594, 595, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 917;People v. Dolphy, 257 A.D.2d 681, 685, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 872). In this case, defendant's extensive criminal history, as well as the fact that his sentence was the anticipated outcome of a plea bargain agreement, militate against a reduction in his sentence (see People v. Kelly, 279 A.D.2d 891, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 802; People v. McGarry, 219 A.D.2d 744,lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 848). The record discloses that defendant's criminal record spans over 30 years and includes 14 previous sentences of incarceration resulting from criminal convictions that include rape in the third degree, grand larceny, robbery in the third degree, attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and intimidating a victim/witness in the third degree. Under the circumstances presented here, the sentence imposed by County Court will not be disturbed.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cartwright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 2, 2003
301 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Cartwright

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RALPH J. CARTWRIGHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 2, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 195

Citing Cases

State v. Wallach

Initially, we find no merit to defendant's claim that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Defendant has an…

People v. Williams

Nevertheless, we find no merit to defendant's claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive. Defendant has…