People v. Carter

1 Citing case

  1. People v. Cooke

    152 Misc. 2d 311 (N.Y. Just. Ct. 1991)   Cited 10 times

    Plainly, a definition so specific has no bearing on the present case and, in any event, the conviction, for violating a different portion of the ordinance, was reversed. People v Carter ( 13 A.D.2d 652 [1st Dept 1961]) also suggests that public urination may be disorderly conduct. Although the memorandum decision of the Appellate Division in that case appears to be purposely obscure as to the underlying facts, the respondent's brief reveals that the defendant-appellant had been charged with indecent exposure under former Penal Law § 1140 and convicted of disorderly conduct under former Penal Law § 722 (1) and (2) as a lesser included offense for allegedly exposing his private parts and urinating in a classroom where he had been taking an examination.