From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carter

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 23, 2017
147 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

02-23-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth CARTER, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Svetlana M. Kornfeind of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Svetlana M. Kornfeind of counsel), for appellant.Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered December 13, 2011, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him to a fine of $25, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Officers patrolling a New York City Housing Authority building observed that defendant unsuccessfully tried to enter the building, then waited until someone entered with a key and followed him inside. Even if this means of entry may have had innocent explanations, it provided an objective credible reason for the officers' level one inquiry as to whether defendant lived in the building (see People v. Verges, 120 A.D.3d 1028, 991 N.Y.S.2d 766 [1st Dept.2014], lv. denied 24 N.Y.3d 1047, 998 N.Y.S.2d 317, 23 N.E.3d 160 [2014] ). Defendant answered the officers' questions to the extent of admitting that he was not a resident of the building and maintaining that he was visiting someone. However, he refused to provide this person's name or apartment number, claiming that this might get his friend in unspecified "trouble." Under these circumstances, "the totality of the information before the officer supported a reasonable inference, for probable cause purposes, that defendant was not ‘licensed or privileged’ (Penal Law § 140.00[5] ) to be in a building in which he admittedly did not reside" (People v. Barksdale, 110 A.D.3d 498, 499, 974 N.Y.S.2d 347 [1st Dept.2013], affd. 26 N.Y.3d 139, 20 N.Y.S.3d 296, 41 N.E.3d 1111 [2015] ), providing the officers with probable cause to arrest him and conduct a lawful search incident to arrest.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RICHTER, KAPNICK, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Carter

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 23, 2017
147 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth CARTER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

147 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
147 A.D.3d 635
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 1443

Citing Cases

People v. Carter

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 147 AD3d 635 (NY)…