From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carr

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 19, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7299 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

No. 95

10-19-2017

The People & c., Respondent, v. James L. Carr, Appellant.

Evan M. Lumley, for appellant. Nicholas T. Texido, for respondent.


Evan M. Lumley, for appellant.

Nicholas T. Texido, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

There was no error in the denial of defendant's motion to vacate the judgment. Under these circumstances, the People were not required to seek court permission under CPL 190.75 (3) before presenting additional charges to a second grand jury. We do not pass upon whether a CPL 440.10 motion lies to bring this claim, as that question is not before us.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Judge Fahey took no part.

Decided October 19, 2017


Summaries of

People v. Carr

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 19, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7299 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Carr

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. James L. Carr, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7299 (N.Y. 2017)