From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 2, 1989

Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was indicted for the crime of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25). The first count of the indictment alleged that on December 14, 1984 he intentionally caused the death of John W. Moore. The second count charged defendant with murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25), alleging that, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he recklessly engaged in conduct which created a grave risk of death to another and thereby caused the death of John W. Moore. He was also charged with two counts of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Penal Law § 165.08). Following a jury trial, he was found guilty of depraved mind murder on the second count, manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser included offense of intentional murder on the first count, and the two counts of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.

The trial court erred in failing to submit the two murder counts in the alternative, and the verdict finding the defendant guilty of both depraved mind murder and manslaughter in the first degree by reason of extreme emotional disturbance is inconsistent (see, People v. Gallagher, 69 N.Y.2d 525; People v. Robinson, 145 A.D.2d 184). Defendant, however, did not object to the court's submission of both murder counts to the jury. The issue of inconsistent verdicts is not preserved for review unless raised prior to the discharge of the jury, when any infirmity might be remedied by resubmission of its verdict to the jury for reconsideration (People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745; People v Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048, 1050; People v. Dukett, 147 A.D.2d 938; People v. Paxhia, 140 A.D.2d 962, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 960). We decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice (see, People v. Dukett, supra; People v. Claudio, 135 A.D.2d 358, 359).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining claims and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD LEE CAREY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 429

Citing Cases

People v. Valdez

The defendant contends that the verdict finding him guilty of both counts is inconsistent (see, People v.…

People v. Ruiz

The defendant's contention that the trial court should have submitted both murder counts to the jury in the…