From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 18, 1992

Appeal from the Erie County Court, D'Amico, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant had the right to be present during the Sandoval hearing (see, People v Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656), the record supports a finding that defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to be present (see, People v Parker, 57 N.Y.2d 136, 140; cf., People v Gaines, 144 A.D.2d 941). Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that comments made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial (see, CPL 470.05), and we decline to reach that issue in the interest of justice (see, People v Demott, 178 A.D.2d 935, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 946). In any event, the comments represented a fair response to the summation of defense counsel (see, People v Price, 144 A.D.2d 1013, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 895).


Summaries of

People v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD CAREY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 622

Citing Cases

People v. Brockenshire

Present — Denman, P.J., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ. Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and…