From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1990
168 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 31, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's assertion that his plea allocution was factually insufficient is not preserved for appellate review, and in any event is without merit (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740; People v. Wedgewood, 106 A.D.2d 674). The defendant's remaining contention has not been preserved for appellate review (cf., People v. Quiles, 72 A.D.2d 610). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1990
168 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD CAREY, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Simone

"It is well settled that where the defendant's assertions * * * raise the possibility of a defense, the trial…