From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Caraballo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2013
110 A.D.3d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-2

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joseph CARABALLO, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed September 29, 2011, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, DICKERSON, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Caraballo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2013
110 A.D.3d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Caraballo

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joseph CARABALLO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 2, 2013

Citations

110 A.D.3d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6377
971 N.Y.S.2d 885