Opinion
October 29, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.).
On May 19, 1988 Detective Monge and other members of the drug enforcement task force executed a search warrant targeting apartment 3C of a building on West 174th Street. The officers entered the studio apartment behind a person, who had opened the front door with a key. Defendant was found standing by the door. A triple beam scale, grinders, screens, and a quarter ounce of cocaine were on a nearby table. A revolver was lying on a lower shelf of a nearby wall unit.
Defendant testified that he was outside the apartment when the police entered and that he had entered the apartment to give the tenant a painting estimate, and was awaiting his return.
Contrary to defendant's claims on appeal, his guilt of possessing the gun and the cocaine was established beyond a reasonable doubt. The circumstances under which defendant was found alone in the apartment support the fact finder's conclusion that defendant exercised control over the contraband, which was found in plain view (People v. Reisman, 29 N.Y.2d 278). The possibility that defendant did not have a leading role in the illicit activity conducted in the apartment does not insulate him from liability, where the evidence shows that he had full control of the apartment, and the cocaine and the gun, which were within his immediate control and reach and, therefore, available for his use (People v. Lemmons, 40 N.Y.2d 505).
Defendant's remaining arguments are unpreserved or meritless.
Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.