From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Canty

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2021-03606 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2021-03606 Ind. 1333/18

06-09-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Timothy Canty, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Desiree Sheridan of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Desiree Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Miller, J.), imposed April 15, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Canty

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2021-03606 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Canty

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Timothy Canty…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-03606 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)