From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Canty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 29, 2019
176 A.D.3d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10234 Ind. 3037/17

10-29-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy CANTY, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Mazzarelli, Webber, Oing, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Canty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 29, 2019
176 A.D.3d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Canty

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy Canty…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

176 A.D.3d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 7745
109 N.Y.S.3d 630