From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Canty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 2003
2 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-02619.

Decided December 8, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurkin-Torres, J.), rendered March 19, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Isaac S. Greaney of counsel), for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions concerning the closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the "ghost" undercover police officer are not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Sanabria, 301 A.D.2d 307; People v. Davis, 300 A.D.2d 69; People v. Oliphant, 258 A.D.2d 536; People v. Escabar, 226 A.D.2d 650).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental brief, either are not properly before this court, unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit.

RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, SMITH and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Canty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 2003
2 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Canty

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. TERRELL CANTY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 918