From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cantor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the trial court improperly dismissed a venireperson who was peremptorily challenged by the People in violation of Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). However, the court properly found that the race-neutral reason proffered for the challenge was not pretextual (see, People v. McArthur, 178 A.D.2d 612). To the extent that the defendant's argument rests on a factual challenge as to what was said by the subject venireperson during questioning, the defendant failed to establish a "factual record sufficient to permit appellate review" (People v. Kinchen, 60 N.Y.2d 772, 774; see also, People v. Cruz, 200 A.D.2d 581; People v. Irizarry, 165 A.D.2d 715; People v. Campanella, 176 A.D.2d 813).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cantor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Cantor

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AMANDO CANTOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 832

Citing Cases

State of N.Y. v. Thompson

Under these circumstances, it must be deemed that the matter was cured to defense counsel's satisfaction, and…