From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Canole

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 17, 2014
123 A.D.3d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-17

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher CANOLE, appellant.

Janet A. Gandolfo, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., for appellant. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Elizabeth L. Schulz of counsel), for respondent.


Janet A. Gandolfo, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., for appellant. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Elizabeth L. Schulz of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered November 30, 2012, convicting him of arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Pryor, 11 A.D.3d 565, 782 N.Y.S.2d 803). In any event, the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; see also People v. M'Lady, 59 A.D.3d 568, 873 N.Y.S.2d 331). SKELOS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS–RADIX, DUFFY and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Canole

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 17, 2014
123 A.D.3d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Canole

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher CANOLE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 17, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8854
996 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Tissiera

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly,…

People v. Tissiera

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered…