From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cano

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
May 27, 2011
No. B231804 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 27, 2011)

Opinion

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BA019991, Jose I. Sandoval, Judge.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General and Shira B. Seigle, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


TURNER, P. J.

Defendant, Jorge Marquez Cano, purports to appeal from a March 4, 2011 post-judgment order denying his motion to vacate. The post-judgment motion argued that defendant is the victim of mistaken identity. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own motion and issued an order to show cause re: dismissal on our own motion. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) The post-judgment March 4, 2011 order may not be appealable. (People v. Cantrell (1961) 197 Cal.App.2d 40, 43; People v. Bowles (1933) 135 Cal.App. 514, 516; see People v. Thomas (1959) 52 Cal.2d 521, 527; see 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) “Criminal Appeals, ” § 53, p. 299.)

The appeal is dismissed.

We concur: KRIEGLER, J., KUMAR, J.

Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.


Summaries of

People v. Cano

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
May 27, 2011
No. B231804 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 27, 2011)
Case details for

People v. Cano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JORGE MARQUEZ CANO, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division

Date published: May 27, 2011

Citations

No. B231804 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 27, 2011)