From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1990
160 A.D.2d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 9, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a severance of the counts of the indictment. The charges against the defendant were properly joined pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c) (see, People v Kurtz, 51 N.Y.2d 380; People v. Famulari, 146 A.D.2d 710; People v Barksdale, 140 A.D.2d 531, 532; People v. Collins, 136 A.D.2d 720).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find that they are not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245) or without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1990
160 A.D.2d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROY CANNON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 258