From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Canning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1985
114 A.D.2d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 25, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Lazer, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Canning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1985
114 A.D.2d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Canning

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CANDICE CANNING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)