Summary
In People v. Candelaria (258 A.D.2d 590, 1999 N.Y. Slip Op 01503 [2d Dept, Feb. 16, 1999]), the Appellate Division, Second Department, recently upheld a conviction for criminal possession of stolen property where the evidence consisted of a series of events consistent with the theory that the defendant acted in concert with the operator of a stolen car to effectuate its theft.
Summary of this case from People v. SheldonOpinion
February 16, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction of the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Police officers observed the defendant operating a vehicle with no lights on at approximately 3:20 A.M., closely following a stolen vehicle which also had no lights on and which had been stripped of numerous parts, including body panels and seats. As the police car approached, the two vehicles increased speed. The driver of the stripped car then pulled over and fled on foot. The defendant pulled his vehicle over a short distance away, and the driver of the stripped car ran toward it, but then changed direction as a pursuing police officer neared. The defendant then drove away from the scene and was found shortly thereafter parked approximately one block away. Parts of the stolen car were found on the person of the defendant's front-seat passenger, as well as in the yard outside of which the defendant had parked his vehicle. Under all of these circumstances, we are satisfied that a rational trier of fact could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted in concert with the operator of the stolen car in committing the offenses of which he was convicted ( see, Penal Law § 20.00; see generally, People v. Rossey, 89 N.Y.2d 970; People v. Allah, 71 N.Y.2d 830; People v. Whatley, 69 N.Y.2d 784).
Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.