From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cancer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 8, 2015
132 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-10-8

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Latoya CANCER, Appellant.

Barrett D. Mack, Albany, for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Nikki Kowalski of counsel), for respondent.



Barrett D. Mack, Albany, for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Nikki Kowalski of counsel), for respondent.
Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE and CLARK, JJ.

McCARTHY, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered September 17, 2013, convicting defendant upon her guilty plea of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

Following an investigation by the Attorney General's Organized Crime Task Force, defendant and 33 others were charged in a 226–count indictment with conspiracy and other crimes stemming from the distribution of cocaine in multiple counties in New York. Defendant was also separately charged in a superior court information with grand larceny in the third degree, and the Albany County District Attorney filed a petition alleging that she had violated probation. The Attorney General and District Attorney negotiated a joint plea agreement to resolve all three matters, which required defendant's cooperation with the conspiracy investigation. Pursuant thereto, defendant entered a guilty plea to count 195 of the indictment, which charged her with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and to attempted grand larceny in the third degree, and she admitted violating probation. As part of that agreement, defendant waived her right to appeal as to all three matters and signed a written waiver of appeal.

Defendant was named in three counts of the indictment which charged her with conspiracy in the second degree (count 1) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees (counts 194 and 195, respectively).

The violation of probation matter is the subject of a separate appeal (People v. Cancer, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 17 N.Y.S.3d 325 [Appeal No. 106293, decided herewith] ).

At sentencing, County Court revoked defendant's probation and imposed a one-year jail term with credit for time served on the violation petition. With respect to the attempted grand larceny conviction, the court granted defendant a conditional discharge and ordered her to pay certain restitution. The court subsequently imposed a one-year jail term on the drug-related conviction, to be served consecutively to the one-year term imposed for violating probation. Defendant now appeals from the judgment of conviction for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

On appeal, defendant argues that she did not get the benefit of the promised plea agreement with regard to her sentence, which she also argues is harsh and excessive. Given that defendant has completed her consecutive one-year jail sentences during the pendency of this appeal, these claims related to sentencing are moot ( see People v. Rodwell, 122 A.D.3d 1065, 1068, 996 N.Y.S.2d 398 [2014], lv. denied25 N.Y.3d 1170, 15 N.Y.S.3d 302, 36 N.E.3d 105 [2015]; People v. Pozzi, 117 A.D.3d 1325, 1325, 986 N.Y.S.2d 669 [2014]; People v. Trombley, 111 A.D.3d 984, 984–985, 974 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2013] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. EGAN JR., ROSE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cancer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 8, 2015
132 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Cancer

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Latoya CANCER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 8, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 7304
17 N.Y.S.3d 786

Citing Cases

People v. Stabler

--------Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that County Court abused its discretion in denying her motion…

People v. Stabler

-------- Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that County Court abused its discretion in denying her motion…