From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Campridon

Supreme Court of California
Jun 13, 1928
204 Cal. 701 (Cal. 1928)

Opinion

Docket No. Crim. 3100.

June 13, 1928.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J.J. Trabucco, Judge Presiding. Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

John V. Copren for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Emery F. Mitchell, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The appellant's petition for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal for the first appellate district, division one, was granted chiefly for the reason that one of the main questions presented upon this appeal was under submission before this court in the case of People v. Scofield, 203 Cal. 703 [ 265 P. 914]. The judgment and order in that case were reversed for the reason, among others, that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in the giving of substantially the same instruction to the jury which is the subject of appellant's criticism in the instant case. This being so, it follows that the judgment and order herein must be reversed upon the authority of People v. Scofield, supra, and for the reasons set forth therein. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

People v. Campridon

Supreme Court of California
Jun 13, 1928
204 Cal. 701 (Cal. 1928)
Case details for

People v. Campridon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. ALBERT CAMPRIDON, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jun 13, 1928

Citations

204 Cal. 701 (Cal. 1928)
268 P. 372

Citing Cases

People v. Lowell

It was held that the jury should have been required to agree on one particular offense. People v. Campridon,…

People v. Dutra

Under such circumstances, it can neither be held that error does not appear nor that it was not prejudicial.…