From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 4, 1994
200 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.).


The court properly denied, without a hearing, the defendant's pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see, CPL 220.60; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520). The defendant's allegations of coercion and inadequate representation, made in his motion two months after the plea, were belied by the record of both the plea and sentencing proceedings, in which the defendant expressed the fact that he understood the plea he was entering, and that his motive in entering the plea was a promise of early parole. The plea was adequate on its face, and the fact that the colloquy during the plea was strained does not lead to a conclusion that defendant's decision to enter a plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 4, 1994
200 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT CAMPBELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 4, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 186

Citing Cases

People v. Negron

uch ground nor to vacate the judgment of conviction ( People v Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, affg 202 A.D.2d 330).…

People v. Lee

Further, reversal is not warranted inasmuch as the record reveals that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily…