From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1998
255 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.).


Defendant failed to preserve, by specific objection, his challenges to the undercover officer's testimony with reference to the absence of prerecorded buy money ( People v. Graves, 85 N.Y.2d 1024, 1026-27), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that to the extent this testimony could be considered statistical evidence, it was sufficiently brief and limited to avoid undue prejudice ( People v. Vargas, 213 A.D.2d 258, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 742; People v. Tevaha, 204 A.D.2d 92, affd 84 N.Y.2d 879).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1998
255 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRED CAMPBELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Although testimony about similar drug sales that did not involve defendant should have been excluded, such…