From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 593.

May 19, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered March 14, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 17 years, unanimously affirmed.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Sara Gurwich of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Chamoy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.


The court's Sandoval ruling, which permitted the People to elicit defendant's prior sex crime conviction without inquiring into any underlying facts, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion ( see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203; People v Pauao, 59 NY2d 282, 292).

Defendant's Confrontation Clause claim, relating to DNA test documents, is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits ( see People v Freycinet, 11 NY3d 38, 42; People v Rawlins, 10 NY3d 136, 153-160).


Summaries of

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROHAN CAMPBELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3943
878 N.Y.S.2d 620

Citing Cases

Campbell v. Lee

First, the claim is procedurally barred in light of the Appellate Division's finding that the claim is…