Opinion
F041741.
10-24-2003
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DONALD R. CAMACK, Defendant and Appellant.
Danalynn Pritz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Carlos Martinez, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
THE COURT
In December 2000 appellant Donald Camack pled no contest to assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)). In February 2001 the court imposed the three-year midterm, suspended execution of sentence, and placed appellant on three years probation. In May 2002 appellant was convicted of disturbing the peace (Pen. Code, § 415). Based on that conviction, in July 2002 the court found that appellant had violated the condition of his probation that he obey all laws. In September 2002 the court lifted the previously imposed stay on the execution of sentence; ordered the previously stayed sentence imposed; and awarded appellant presentence custody credits of 331 days, consisting of 221 actual time credits and 110 days conduct credits. The instant appeal followed.
Appellants appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.)
Appellant, apparently in response to this courts invitation to submit additional briefing, has submitted two documents in which, as best we can determine, he raises various claims of error. These claims are without merit.
Upon independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed. --------------- Notes: Before Vartabedian, Acting P.J., Wiseman, J., and Dawson, J.