From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Calvert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1999
266 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued September 24, 1999

November 1, 1999

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Laura Lieberman Cohen and Andrew Abraham of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Sharon Y. Brodt, Merri Turk Lasky, and Margaret A. Helen MacFarlane of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered December 23, 1996, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court's Sandoval ruling, permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine the defendant concerning two prior convictions for assault, was proper. Those offenses were relevant on the issues of the defendant's credibility as a witness and his willingness to place his interests above those of society (see, People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371, 377 ; People v. Byrd, 173 A.D.2d 549 ; People v. Ferreira, 172 A.D.2d 769 ; People v. Noeth, 162 A.D.2d 724 ).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit.

THOMPSON, J.P., JOY, McGINITY, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Calvert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1999
266 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Calvert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. NORMAN CALVERT, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the…

People v. Johnson

The trial court's Sandoval ruling (see People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371), which permitted the prosecutor to…