Opinion
December 1, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demakos, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record of the Huntley hearing and conclude that the evidence supports the suppression court's determination that the defendant's statements were voluntarily made (see, People v. Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35, 38; People v Eastman, 114 A.D.2d 509; People v. Pearson, 106 A.D.2d 588). Further, there was evidence of sufficient quantity and quality to support the defendant's conviction of assault in the second degree (see, People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932; People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620; People v. Bigelow, 106 A.D.2d 448). Finally, the sentence imposed was neither unduly harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.