From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Callaghan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 20, 2008
56 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4643.

November 20, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth L. Sussman, J.), entered on or about March 1, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Jessica Macari of counsel), for respondent.

Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Catterson and DeGrasse, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level ( see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545). Defendant's conduct following his release from custody did not warrant such a departure, given the seriousness of the underlying crime and defendant's overall criminal record.

Defendant's challenges to his total presumptive risk factor score are unpreserved and, in any event, unavailing, since it is undisputed that even with the reductions he seeks, he would still qualify as a level three offender.


Summaries of

People v. Callaghan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 20, 2008
56 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Callaghan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN CALLAGHAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 20, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9191
868 N.Y.S.2d 182

Citing Cases

People v. Gonzalez

Since defendant did not ask the SORA court for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level, that…

People v. Gonzalez

Since defendant did not ask the SORA court for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level, that…