From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Calendar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 28, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The transcript of the defendant's plea proceeding does not indicate that the defendant was told that if he failed to appear for sentencing the court could impose harsher sentences than the ones that were promised. Accordingly, even though the defendant failed to appear for sentencing, the court could not impose sentences greater than those for which the defendant had bargained without first affording him an opportunity to withdraw his pleas and stand trial ( see, People v. Hodge, 207 A.D.2d 845; People v. Elliot, 204 A.D.2d 565; People v. Rosa, 194 A.D.2d 755; People v. Argil C., 190 A.D.2d 856, 857).

In light of the above determination, the defendant's remaining contentions need not be addressed. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Calendar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Calendar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM CALENDAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

People v. Stewart

The County Court imposed an enhanced sentence based on the fact that the defendant was arrested on unrelated…

People v. Santiago

The transcript of the defendant's plea proceeding does not indicate that he was told, and it cannot be…