Opinion
November 30, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Failla, J.).
While defendant was awaiting arraignment on attempted murder charges, the detective investigating an unrelated incident, during which defendant had been recognized and named by another officer, learned of his detention and picked him up from the prearraignment holding area of the courthouse to return him to the precinct for a lineup identification and questioning. The lineup took place within 3 to 4 hours of their arrival at the precinct, after fillers were obtained and the identifying officer retrieved from his field assignment. Approximately 2 to 3 hours later, defendant received and waived his Miranda warnings and made a statement concerning the earlier incident.
When defendant was picked up from the courthouse, he had already been held for some 2 days without arraignment but he makes no complaint about this initial period of delay. As for the delay caused by the investigation into the charges unrelated to his prearraignment detention, we find no merit to defendant's argument that the delay was unnecessary or calculated to prevent attachment of his right to counsel (see, People v Hopkins, 58 N.Y.2d 1079).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Rubin, JJ.