From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cadigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 23, 2019
171 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9077 Ind. 5152/15

04-23-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cornelius CADIGAN, Defendant–Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Megan DeMarco of counsel), for respondent.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Megan DeMarco of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Webber, Singh, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered December 6, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cadigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 23, 2019
171 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Cadigan

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cornelius Cadigan…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 23, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3009
96 N.Y.S.3d 851