From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cabral

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Jan 24, 2024
223 A.D.3d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

01-24-2024

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Victor CABRAL, appellant

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Brian Perbix of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Lauren Slattery on the memorandum), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Brian Perbix of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Lauren Slattery on the memorandum), for respondent.

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., ANGELA G. IANNACCI, LARA J. GENOVESI, LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heidi C. Cesare, J.), imposed January 11, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

[1, 2] Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he validly waived his right to appeal (see People v. Porter, 210 A.D.3d 911, 911, 176 N.Y.S.3d 788). The Supreme Court "adequately advise[d] the defendant of the nature of the right to appeal and the consequences of waiving that right" (People v. Vilmont, 216 A.D.3d 1113, 1114, 189 N.Y.S.3d 721). The court sufficiently "explained, and the defendant acknowledged that he understood, the separate and distinct nature of the waiver of the right to appeal, and the court did not mischaracterize the nature or scope of the waiver" (People v. Headley, 197 A.D.3d 1329, 1330, 151 N.Y.S.3d 905). The defendant therefore "knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal at the time he entered his plea of guilty" (id. at 1329, 151 N.Y.S.3d 905). The defendant’s valid waiver of that right precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Delacruz, 213 A.D.3d 691, 691, 180 N.Y.S.3d 916; People v. Smith, 208 A.D.3d 1369, 1369–1370, 174 N.Y.S.3d 609; People v. Lawrence, 184 A.D.3d 587, 587, 123 N.Y.S.3d 530).

CONNOLLY, J.P., IANNACCI, GENOVESI and VENTURA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cabral

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Jan 24, 2024
223 A.D.3d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Cabral

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Victor CABRAL, appellant

Court:New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Date published: Jan 24, 2024

Citations

223 A.D.3d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
223 A.D.3d 839

Citing Cases

People v. Sarasty

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and…

People v. Pitt

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and…