From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Caballero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 16, 1995
215 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Bernstein, J.).


It is undisputed that there were 158 days of includable time out of a permissible 184 days. In addition, the court properly included periods of time in which the People failed to exercise due diligence in executing a bench warrant (People v Bolden, 81 N.Y.2d 146), including a 32-day period of total inaction following completion of any administrative processing of the warrant. Accordingly, we do not reach any other issue.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rubin, Asch and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Caballero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 16, 1995
215 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Caballero

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MIGLEO CABALLERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 16, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 773

Citing Cases

Matter of Crumb

Finally, the Presentment Agency did not request assistance from the Police Department's Warrant Squad until…

Carnegie Hill Orthopedic Serv. v. Geico Ins.

The Court agrees with defendant that a document request cannot be used to determine if documents exist, as…