From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Butti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 1998
250 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 26, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the amount of restitution from $285,920 to $184,492; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the delay in imposing sentence was so unreasonable as to deprive the court of jurisdiction. This contention is raised for the first time on appeal and is therefore unpreserved for appellate review. As this Court explained in People v. Marshall ( 228 A.D.2d 15), it is important in considering such a claim to distinguish between sentencing delays caused by the defendant and those caused by the State: "Because of that distinction, and the differing consequences based on who is to blame for the delay, it is important that any claim of unreasonable sentence delay be presented to the trial court. In that way each side is free to present and argue the facts, so that the court may allocate the reasons for the delay, and the extent of responsibility to be borne by either party" (People v. Marshall, supra, at 17). Since the defendant failed to raise this issue before the sentencing court, the record is devoid of the facts necessary to review his claim, and we decline to remit the case to the County Court for a hearing (see, People v. Marshall, supra).

Upon the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction, we have reduced the amount of restitution that the defendant is required to pay to $184,492. The plea allocution reveals that the defendant agreed to waive a hearing on the issue of restitution based on the understanding that restitution would not exceed that amount. The defendant's contention that the sentence is otherwise excessive is without merit (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or based on matters outside the record.

O'Brien, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Butti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 1998
250 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Butti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS BUTTI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 794

Citing Cases

State v. Butti

Cardona, P.J. After defendant, a chiropractor, pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree,…

People v. Robinson

The parties agree, and the record establishes, that the court promised at the time of the plea to cap the…