From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bushell

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 17, 2021
191 A.D.3d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2017–11451 Ind. No. 8572/13

02-17-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Taalib BUSHELL, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. ( Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. ( Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. ( Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. ( Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., HECTOR D. LASALLE, BETSY BARROS, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Miller, J., at plea; Miriam Cyrulnik, J., at sentence), rendered October 11, 2017, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of protection issued at the time of sentencing.

ORDERED that upon the appeal from the judgment, so much of the order of protection as directed that it remain in effect until and including October 11, 2026, is vacated, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the duration of the order of protection; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The duration of the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing exceeded the maximum time limit set forth in CPL 530.13(4)(A). Accordingly, we vacate so much of the order of protection as directed that it remain in effect until and including October 11, 2026, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the duration of the order of protection ( see People v. Thomas, 187 A.D.3d 1069, 131 N.Y.S.3d 167 ; People v. Ramos, 164 A.D.3d 922, 923–924, 82 N.Y.S.3d 103 ).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v. Alston, 188 A.D.3d 1235, 132 N.Y.S.3d 782 ).

DILLON, J.P., LASALLE, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bushell

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 17, 2021
191 A.D.3d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Bushell

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Taalib Bushell…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2021

Citations

191 A.D.3d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1061
138 N.Y.S.3d 915

Citing Cases

People v. Bushell

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 191 AD3d 897 (Kings)…